Bush budget has 0 dollars for Afghanistan

From: Ramez Naam (mez@apexnano.com)
Date: Mon Feb 17 2003 - 01:29:08 MST

  • Next message: gts: "RE: Performance enhancement with selegiline"

    I would support a US invasion of Iraq if I thought the US was
    committed to sticking around in that country for the decades necessary
    to build a working, healthy democracy. The Bush Administration has
    held Afghanistan up as an example of their commitment to rebuild after
    a war. Those who've followed the news know the the US has actually
    done incredibly little to help rebuild Afghanistan, making this
    example a source of doubt about US behavior in post-war Iraq. Now
    comes even more evidence: Bush's proposed budget to congress for 2004
    contains 0 dollars in spending to help rebuild Afghanistan.

    From the blog of John Marshall:

    ---------------------------

    http://talkingpointsmemo.com/feb0302.html#0214031253am

    Remember that place Afghanistan? You know, we had some guys
    over there. And they wear funny hats and, like, Osama bin Laden had
    a vacation home there or something ...

    This would seem rather to sum up how much the folks at the Bush
    White House remember about the place. Apparently when the
    budgeteers on the Hill started working their way through the
    president's new budget they discovered there was no money, not even
    a line item, for humanitarian or reconstruction funds for Afghanistan.

    Remember, that was the place we weren't going to leave behind and
    so forth.

    Now at first I thought maybe this was a case where the money is in
    there but just not labeled as being for Afghanistan or something like
    that. But that really doesn't seem to be the case. Congress has had to

    go back and stick in $300 million. According to this report from the
    BBC ( http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/south_asia/2759789.stm )...

    The chairman of the committee that distributes foreign aid, Jim Kolbe,

    says that when he asked administration officials why they had not
    requested any funds, he was given no satisfactory explanation, but did

    get a pledge that it would not happen again.

    Jim Kolbe is a Republican, or course. So it's really not clear to me
    what interest he would have in making the folks at the White House
    sound like such goofs. I think you have to figure that it's as big a
    screw-up as it looks like.

    The BBC report also says that Afghan President Hamid Karzai is going
    to be in town this month looking for aid. We'll see how he manages.
    What's really telling isn't the lack of money so much as the fact that

    Karzai and his people didn't even get a mention. They didn't even
    merit
    the standard smoke and mirrors treatment! The ultimate indignity ...



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Feb 17 2003 - 01:31:39 MST