Re: Bush budget has 0 dollars for Afghanistan

From: Dehede011@aol.com
Date: Tue Feb 18 2003 - 08:56:47 MST

  • Next message: Dickey, Michael F: "RE: Increasing Reading speed, Please reply"

    In a message dated 2/17/2003 2:30:57 PM Central Standard Time,
    mez@apexnano.com writes: So, you would think we would create a policy that
    would encourage such a society to come into existence. Now, so far we've
    spent around $15 Billion on the war in Afghanistan, and continue to spend
    around $1.8 Billion a month there on military deployment. By contrast, we've
    spent between $200 and $300 million on reconstruction and peace keeping. To
    me this seems quite short sighted. It focuses resources on the immediate
    crisis without investing in preventing the next crisis.

    Mez,
           Those may be good accounting numbers but I doubt we have spent
    anywhere near that amount of money. The soldiers were getting fed and
    drawing a check anyway. If they were not in Afghanistan they would be out on
    training exercises burning gasoline, shooting off ammo & bombs, wreaking
    vehicles and airplanes.
           As to the amount of money we have spent on reconstruction and peace
    keeping. As the UN is taking care of peacekeeping ideally the US wouldn't be
    spending anything. That leaves reconstruction and if your number is correct
    then I have to feel that number would really get fuzzy. For example we know
    from reading that the military has spent a lot feeding people, delivering
    food, building roads, bridges and rehabilitating runways.
           But in the end the Afghanistanis with have to do it themselves. It is
    there country, that oil pipeline that is supposed to be worth trillions
    should provide them some capabillity to do their own reconstruction.
           Besides wouldn't you be the first to criticise if the US went in there
    rebuilding the country in our image?
    Ron h



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Feb 18 2003 - 08:59:20 MST