Re: ENERGY: Singularity on hold?

From: Spudboy100@aol.com
Date: Fri Jun 13 2003 - 23:10:27 MDT

  • Next message: Karen Rand Smigrodzki: "Re: How best to spend US$200 billion? RE: `twisted ethics prevalent onthe extropy board'"

    I am a big fan of methane-based energy and look favorably on biomass too. Are
    these solar ponds sealed from the environment with lexan plastic, which would
    keep out dust, fungus, rain, grass, bird droppings, and insects? How much
    methane, in cubic feet could these ponds produce? Enough to power a 100 million
    car fleet? Could the methane be converted to methanol or should vehicles be run
    on CNG? Would such a technology be "blown out of the saddle" with competition
    from Alaskan natural gas, or the development of methane hydrates from
    clathrate oceanic sources?

    Mitch

    Robert Bradbury stated:
    <<Actually there is a solution very close to that.  Creating methane in
    solar ponds using engineered bacteria, put into the existing pipeline
    system, sent to retooled refineries that convert it into propane or
    octane, perhaps using some power from spike's windmills.  Converting short
    chain hydrocarbons into longer chain hydrocarbons I don't believe is
    particularly difficult (though I'm not a chemist).  The hard part
    (currently) is having a sufficient quantity of the short chain
    hydrocarbons (which are currently all being pumped out of the ground
    rather than manufactured above ground).

    You have to use a significant fraction of the rangeland in the U.S.
    southwest, but if my numbers are correct the economics seem *very*
    favorable, so the conversion from rangeland to solar ponds might take
    place very quickly.  The price of steak may go up (as there is less
    rangeland on which to graze cattle), but I think I come out ahead -- I
    fill up my gas tank much more frequently than I eat steak.

    Robert>>



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Jun 13 2003 - 23:19:26 MDT