RE: Dennis May replies/was Re: One solution to the Fermi Paradox

From: Lee Corbin (lcorbin@tsoft.com)
Date: Sun Feb 23 2003 - 00:31:31 MST

  • Next message: Lee Corbin: "The Big Mideast Payoff Scandal (was Egypt)"

    Robert Bradbury wrote

    > [mailto:owner-extropians@extropy.org]On Behalf Of Robert J. Bradbury
    > Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 4:46 AM
    > Lee Corbin [lcorbin@tsoft.com] wrote:
    >
    > >At some early stages of the Von Neumann probe dispersal, this
    > >seems right. But then as one civilization begins using all
    > >available matter ruthlessly grasping for every cycle of compute
    > >power, this passes, I'd say.
    >
    > I would tend to agree with this. The entire von Neumann probe
    > dispersal scenario seems very boring. So you conquer every bit
    > of available matter -- so what? You either have a very dumb
    > mechanical galaxy ruled by "we shall control everything" bots
    > or you have something more alive and evolving.

    Why do you suppose that after everything in our galaxy is
    converted to computronium, or as near as it can get, that
    the galaxy'll be a bore? Think of all the thinking that
    will be going on.

    > That allows scenarios like the Klingon or Romulan
    > civilizations to evolve. That seems much more interesting.

    Sounds like science fiction, to me. Like Brin's boring
    uplift scenarios (I haven't read the books, and they may
    indeed be lotsa fun), but alien species? C'mon. On this
    list it's commonplace that any technology that gets past
    a very primitive level goes singularity---and the least
    that I mean by that is that it becomes silicon.

    > There *will* be a situation where "everything" is used up. It
    > may happen very very far in our future when we have had to resolve
    > whether or not the Romulan or Klingon civilization perspectives
    > might indeed be best. I don't know.... The expansion of civilizations
    > to fully utilize the resources available to them was made by Dyson
    > 40+ years ago.

    The scenario I've been imagining for the last 10 years or
    so, and I don't recall that I've seen it refuted, is "The
    Wind from Earth". In this, the whole solar system is
    converted to living tissue in just the next two hundred
    years or so. (This is quite in line with other people's
    singularity scenarios.)

    Then this center of life spreads out at just about the
    speed of light. The first (highly intelligent) probes
    reach the nearby stars and convert it to living tissue
    also. That which is Dead, i.e., not yet converted to
    Life, consists only of atoms outside the expanding
    sphere at any given time T.

    Meanwhile, at a given radius R from Earth---or perhaps
    from Jupiter---local Life fights a constant struggle
    for existence. What to do about the algorithms from
    Earth?

    Yes, they're newer and more powerful, and they've
    been beamed straight from the center, but can they
    be trusted? How severely do they affect local
    identity? The dilemma: if you don't use them, then
    you fall further and further behind, but if you do
    use them, you may lose your identity.

    I see this technological gradient as being probably
    permanent: always near the center will be the most
    advanced algorithms (entities), because kilotons of
    matter cannot even begin to explore all the possible
    algorithms of the future. A human brain could easily
    run on a 1cc device, and no telling what could run
    on a Jupiter brain. But the Jupiter brain's program
    (its algorithms) will hardly be optimal. So large
    is the search space that perhaps optimality will
    never be within any finite time.

    Lee



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Feb 23 2003 - 00:27:35 MST