Re: Dennis May replies/was Re: One solution to the Fermi Paradox

From: Spudboy100@aol.com
Date: Sun Feb 16 2003 - 11:02:03 MST

  • Next message: Damien Broderick: "RE: The Buzz in Baghdad"

    Lee Corbin noted:
    <<Talk about "advanced ETI's" somehow remaining aloof
    from our planet is merely emotionally appealing SF.
    "There aren't any"; that's the answer to the Fermi
    question.

    Lee Corbin>>

    Just to chime in on this matter, I agree with LC to a great extent. My only
    caveats to his and Fermi's conclusion is that it has probably taken 10-13
    billion years for the cosmos to 'settle down' to the point where life can
    develop, expand, and evolve. Secondly, much to the chagrin of George Lucas,
    and Gene Roddenbury, technological life is probably pretty, freakin' rare in
    this cosmological era. What I am envisioning is the evolution of
    technological life every 100,000 years, in every Barred-Spiral galaxy (a
    guess) and that means for this galaxy--we is it, for now. Perhaps over the
    astronomical lifespan of a galaxy, of the barred-spiral type; it may produce
    20-200 such civilizations. Concluding, we have a few billion years to go
    before star material exhausts and everything is in white dwarf-ville, or
    neutron, or p-stars.

    Going to the Orions-Arm.org view of the deep future, we are more likely to,
    ourselves become Marvel Comic style X-Men, and send genetic, electronic, and
    cultural data, and replicate ourselves thus (perhaps narcissistically) among
    the galaxy. Additionally we have the Uplift phenomena, which may, in reality,
    be doable. Or not.

    Still, the SETI stuff may pan out after all and supply us with millenia of
    entertainment.
    Its worth a good hunt.



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Feb 16 2003 - 11:04:46 MST