Re: Dennis May replies/was Re: One solution to the Fermi Paradox

From: Robert J. Bradbury (bradbury@aeiveos.com)
Date: Wed Feb 19 2003 - 05:45:33 MST

  • Next message: gts: "RE: Performance enhancement with selegiline"

    This will be a reply to Daniel, Dennis and Lee based on some
    incorporation of posts that have showed up on the Javien Forum
    but not the ExI List itself (yet).

    Lee Corbin [lcorbin@tsoft.com] wrote:

    >At some early stages of the Von Neumann probe dispersal, this
    >seems right. But then as one civilization begins using all
    >available matter ruthlessly grasping for every cycle of compute
    >power, this passes, I'd say.

    I would tend to agree with this. The entire von Neumann probe
    dispersal scenario seems very boring. So you conquer every bit
    of available matter -- so what? You either have a very dumb
    mechanical galaxy ruled by "we shall control everything" bots
    or you have something more alive and evolving. That allows
    scenarios like the Klingon or Romulan civilizations to evolve.
    That seems much more interesting.

    From Dennis:

    > Competition between groups, particularly given WoMD, will prevent every
    > speck of matter from being used.

    This statement demonstrates a lack of understanding of scale by Dennis.
    Current WoMD are useless/irrelevant on stellar scales.

    One could explode all of the nuclear weapons that exist on our
    planet today and it would hardly be noticed on a planet orbiting
    around Alpha Centauri.

    The statement Dennis makes demonstrates a key lack of appreciation
    for two facts of life:
     a) the power output of a star vs. a typical WoMD
     b) typical distances between stars and how long it is likely
        to take to travel between them.

    Dennis makes an interesting observation with:
    > With WoMD [geometric destruction] and geometric replication [von Neumann
    > probes/biological systems] it is not obvious that there will ever be any
    > situation where everything is used up.

    Discarding the geometric destruction card (Dennis clearly does not
    make his case in this forum -- a Matrioshka Brain is managing 10^26 W)
    In comparison, one megaton of TNT produces 4.2x10^15 joules and the
    largest nuclear weapons ever designed produce about 100 times this
    amount of energy. So the largest WoMD ever imagined by human beings
    still fall short of the power output of a star by about 7 orders of
    magnitude. It isn't even worth debating.

    There *will* be a situation where "everything" is used up. It
    may happen very very far in our future when we have had to resolve
    whether or not the Romulan or Klingon civilization perspectives
    might indeed be best. I don't know. But the assertion that
    Dennis makes is clearly incorrect. The expansion of civilizations
    to fully utilize the resources avialable to them was made by Dyson
    40+ years ago. If we are going to be debating it now we need
    much stronger arguments than Dennis seems to present.

    Robert

    Robert



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Feb 19 2003 - 05:48:17 MST