RE: Dolly the clone is dead

From: Robert J. Bradbury (bradbury@aeiveos.com)
Date: Fri Feb 14 2003 - 17:43:51 MST

  • Next message: Ian Reilly: "Re: extropians-digest V8 #45"

    On Fri, 14 Feb 2003, Ramez Naam wrote:

    > From: Eliezer S. Yudkowsky [mailto:sentience@pobox.com]
    > > Ramez Naam wrote:
    > > > People are probably going to pick up on this as a sign that
    > > > cloning is not safe.
    > >
    > > It's *not* safe. If anyone is trying to clone humans at this
    > > point, I blame the media's glamorization of cloning.
    >
    > I agree that safety hasn't been sufficiently well established to
    > justify reproductive cloning of humans.

    We have discussed this before and I have even posted concrete
    references regarding the poor prospects for "natural" reproductive
    vectors. Reproduction is an *iffy* pursuit (whether "natural"
    or "cloned"). The situation with Dolly seems to rest on the
    probability of lung infections for animals maintained in indoor pens
    (certainly an unnatural situation). Dolly did provide natural
    offspring and perhaps the attention should be focused on them
    rather than her premature demise.

    Robert



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Feb 14 2003 - 17:46:19 MST