extropians by date

• Most recent messages
• Messages sorted by: [ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Other mail archives

starting:Sun, 03 Oct 1999 23:36:43 -0400
ending:Tue, 05 Oct 1999 08:41:43 -0500

[ first 100 ] [ prev 100 ] [ next 100 ] [ last 100 ]

• 0200 Re: Should we be developing nonlethal meansofself-defense?(wasre:violence) den Otter
• 0201 Re: CRYO: In light of HD neurons? Robert J. Bradbury
• 0202 Re: Should we be developing nonlethal means of self-defense?(wasre:violence) Eugene Leitl
• 0203 Re: Son of Star Wars Robert J. Bradbury
• 0204 Re: Labels do not equal intelligence or success [was Re: violence...] Michael S. Lorrey
• 0205 Re: Take ten paces and then turn and fire!! Michael S. Lorrey
• 0206 Re: Should we be developing nonlethal means of Michael S. Lorrey
• 0207 Re: Take ten paces and then turn and fire!! Joe E. Dees
• 0208 Re: Labels do not equal intelligence or success [was Re: violence...] Joe E. Dees
• 0209 Re: camera tech for crime prevention J. R. Molloy
• 0210  " " Delvieron@aol.com
• 0211 Re: Son of Star Wars John Clark
• 0212 Re: Merge Intel & Microsoft Wei Dai
• 0213 Re: Labels do not equal intelligence or success [was Re: QueeneMUSE@aol.com
• 0214 Question for list upon removal QueeneMUSE@aol.com
• 0215 Multiple realities and borganism Delvieron@aol.com
• 0216 Re: camera tech for crime prevention Chuck Kuecker
• 0217 Re: Try the butch-femme test Kathryn Aegis
• 0218 Re: violence... Brian S
• 0219 Making reservations for >H Philadelphia meeting Delvieron@aol.com
• 0220 Re: Degrees vs. smarts Kathryn Aegis
• 0221 Re: META: list behavior Brian S
• 0222 Re: CRYO: Reanimation options Robin Hanson
• 0223 Re: Merge Intel & Microsoft Robin Hanson
• 0224 Re: Missing Galactic C,N,O - Aliens? Amara Graps
• 0225 Re: Degrees vs. smarts Robin Hanson
• 0226 Professor hopes to clone mammoth J. R. Molloy
• 0227 Re: violence... J. R. Molloy
• 0228 Re: Professor hopes to clone mammoth hal@finney.org
• 0229 Re: Missing Galactic C,N,O - Aliens? Rik van Riel
• 0230 Extropian thing's to do... Brian D Williams
• 0231 Re: Try the butch-femme test KPJ
• 0232 Re: Degrees vs. smarts Elizabeth Childs
• 0233 Re: Multiple realities and borganism Spudboy100@aol.com
• 0234 Re: Degrees vs. smarts Clint O'Dell
• 0235 Re: Multiple realities and borganism Clint O'Dell
• 0236 Re: Degrees vs. smarts Amara Graps
• 0237 Re: Professor hopes to clone mammoth J. R. Molloy
• 0238 Re: TO: Hal on "SETI: A New Vision..." Robert J. Bradbury
• 0239 Re: A question not just for Natasha and Muse but everyone... Anders Sandberg
• 0240 Re: Degrees vs. smarts Robert J. Bradbury
• 0241 Notes from the Earthbound QueeneMUSE@aol.com
• 0242 Re: Extropian thing's to do... S.J. Van Sickle
• 0243 Re: Degrees vs. smarts David Lubkin
• 0244  " " Eugene Leitl
• 0245 Re: Why read philosophy? Ken Clements
• 0246 Re: Degrees vs. smarts Eliezer S. Yudkowsky
• 0247 Re: Why read philosophy? Zeb Haradon
• 0248  " " Natasha Vita-More
• 0249 Re: Degrees vs. smarts Natasha Vita-More
• 0250 Re: META: barfsome terminology J. R. Molloy
• 0251 Re: Why read philosophy? Eliezer S. Yudkowsky
• 0252 Re: Degrees vs. smarts Kathryn Aegis
• 0253 Why read philosophy? David Lubkin
• 0254 Cato Conference/nanotech Gina Miller
• 0255 Re: Degrees vs. smarts David Lubkin
• 0256 Re: Why read philosophy? Dan Fabulich
• 0257  " " Technotranscendence
• 0258  " " Eliezer S. Yudkowsky
• 0259 Re: Berkeleyans Against "Techno-Eugenics" Eliezer S. Yudkowsky
• 0260 Berkeleyans Against "Techno-Eugenics" Chris Fedeli
• 0261 Re: Degrees vs. smarts TriStateF@aol.com
• 0262 Re: Why read philosophy? Chris Fedeli
• 0263 Re: Degrees vs. smarts David Lubkin
• 0264 Re: Why read philosophy? Dan Fabulich
• 0265 Re: META: barfsome terminology Sayke@aol.com
• 0266 Re: Why read philosophy? David Lubkin
• 0267 Re: Should we be developing nonlethal means of Michael S. Lorrey
• 0268 Re: Notes from the Earthbound Michael S. Lorrey
• 0269 Re: Why read philosophy? Michael S. Lorrey
• 0270 Re: Berkeleyans Against "Techno-Eugenics" Michael S. Lorrey
• 0271 Only 14 good reps needed. travellb@boom.com
• 0272 Homeworkers Needed! mowhco@att.net
• 0273 Regarding your organization, TEEL. Michael S. Lorrey
• 0274 Re: META: barfsome terminology Michael S. Lorrey
• 0275 Eugenics: PLS READ [was Berkeleyans Against "Techno-Eugenics"] Robert J. Bradbury
• 0276 Telomerase and Immortality [was Re: Dolly and telomerase] Robert J. Bradbury
• 0277 Re: Future of Cryonics [was Re: I ask your views on Mike Darwin's CampMars@aol.com
• 0278 Re: A question not just for Natasha and Muse but everyone... Delvieron@aol.com
• 0279 Re: CRYO: Reanimation options Delvieron@aol.com
• 0280 Re: Notes from the Earthbound Delvieron@aol.com
• 0281 Re: META: barfsome terminology GBurch1@aol.com
• 0282 Re: Why read philosophy? GBurch1@aol.com
• 0283 Re: A question not just for Natasha and Muse but everyone... Kathryn Aegis
• 0284 Re: camera tech for crime prevention J. R. Molloy
• 0285 Re: Should we be developing Delvieron@aol.com
• 0286 Re: camera tech for crime prevention Delvieron@aol.com
• 0287 Re: Should we be developing nonlethal Delvieron@aol.com
• 0288 Re: Should we be developing nonlethal means of Delvieron@aol.com
• 0289 Re: camera tech for crime prevention Delvieron@aol.com
• 0290 Re: Try the butch-femme test Delvieron@aol.com
• 0291 Re: Should we be Chuck Kuecker
• 0292 Re: Try the butch-femme test Chuck Kuecker
• 0293 Re: Dolly and telomerase Robert J. Bradbury
• 0294 Re: Why read philosophy? Eliezer S. Yudkowsky
• 0295  " " Lee Daniel Crocker
• 0296 Re: Eugenics: PLS READ [was Berkeleyans Against "Techno-Eugenics"] hal@finney.org
• 0297 Re: camera tech for crime prevention J. R. Molloy
• 0298 Re: Why read philosophy? Robin Hanson
• 0299 Including the luddites [was Re: Degrees vs. smarts] Robert J. Bradbury

Last message date: Fri 17 Dec 1999 - 04:46:23 MST
Archived on: Thu Dec 16 1999 - 19:04:42 MST

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Other mail archives