RE: Land of let's only talk about whats wrong with the US

From: matus (matus@matus1976.com)
Date: Wed Aug 20 2003 - 21:34:14 MDT

  • Next message: matus: "RE: Land of let's only talk about whats wrong with the US"

    Max M wrote:
    >
    > But what many of you americans seem to not understand is that we
    > non-americans most often *really* like USA despite it's many
    > faults. But
    > that will not stop us from mentioning the faults.

    I do realize that, but what you who mention only faults don't realize is
    that you are indistinguishable from the chomskyite
    everything-the-US-has-done-is-absolutely-evil kind of person. When you
    hear nothing but criticisms, what evidence do we have to suggest that
    you have anything to say other than criticisms?

    Regardless, and just to clear this up, I think many of the complaints
    waged against the US govt are valid. I would most accurately be
    considered a minarchist libertarian, so I obviously oppose liberal
    paternalism and socialism, and conservative lack of respect for
    individual freedoms. Additionally, I oppose the war on drugs and
    incarceration perpetrators of victimless crimes. The occurrence and
    presence of these things really bothers me, but so do the atrocities
    that occur in other countries, which are often far far worse.

    As far as free countries go, I consider most of the post-industrialized
    west close enough to not really be worth troubling myself over the
    differences while other egregious differences are present in the
    industrial and pre-industrial countries of the world. If I could live
    anywhere I wanted, Id probably first pick Hong Kong (but would end up
    moving soon as the Chinese took control again) second would be a close
    runner up between the US and Australia.

    > That being said, I too found Damiens posting a bit
    > "insensitive" in the
    > light of the recent developments on the list.

    I didn't find it 'insensitive' per se, just wanted to put perspective on
    it relative to other world atrocities. I found it very interesting that
    the article was judging the incarceration rates of populations of the
    world. Interesting, I thought, I wonder how they got accurate data from
    notoriously closed and oppressive societies? If they were saying the US
    has the highest incarceration rate in the world, surely they actually
    looked at the rest of the world.

    Upon further investigation, that was obviously not the case. As noted,
    Iraq, Afghanistan, Burma, East Timor, North Korea etc. for a total of 17
    countries had NO data present to compare. Yet the CS Monitor did not
    find this noteworthy enough to even mention in their article. It should
    have read "US has highest incarceration rate of the countries who would
    tell us theirs, the notoriously worse countries incarceration rates are
    unknown"

    Michael Dickey



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Aug 20 2003 - 21:44:44 MDT