Re: NEWS:Why 'Terrordaq' will come - if the Pentagon likes it or not

From: Adrian Tymes (wingcat@pacbell.net)
Date: Sat Aug 02 2003 - 15:28:46 MDT

  • Next message: Rafal Smigrodzki: "Re: POLITICS: Supporting service"

    --- Robin Hanson <rhanson@gmu.edu> wrote:
    > PAM was never intended to predict individual terror
    > attacks, especially
    > their details.

    Err...then what was it intended for? Another vague
    general alert status?

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Aug 02 2003 - 15:38:11 MDT