RE: A Danger of Apparent Complicity? (was Tranquility Bay)

From: Lee Corbin (lcorbin@tsoft.com)
Date: Fri Jul 25 2003 - 01:26:56 MDT

  • Next message: Samantha Atkins: "Re: free speech on the extrope list"

    Ramez writes

    > > The question is, how accurate is his worry that by "playing
    > > along" with the system for two more years, he will compromise
    > > his own resistance?
    >
    > Surely this is a judgment call based on the strength of conviction of
    > the individual and just how large the gap is between his beliefs and
    > the beliefs he would pretend at.

    Yes, sounds right.

    > I think a good place to search for past examples of this is in
    > espionage. What little I know of the field leads me to believe that a
    > great many spies have been in "deep cover" for years at a time without
    > switching allegiances. Or at least, that's how it is in the spy
    > movies and books. :)

    Ah, great! The *perfect* analogy---completely lighting up
    the whole inquiry. I think you've settled it! Thanks.

    Lee



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Jul 25 2003 - 01:34:52 MDT