RE: A Danger of Apparent Complicity? (was Tranquility Bay)

From: Ramez Naam (mez@apexnano.com)
Date: Fri Jul 25 2003 - 00:47:48 MDT

  • Next message: Damien Broderick: "RE: free speech on the extrope list( was: Re: Precisions on the Martinot situation)"

    From: Lee Corbin [mailto:lcorbin@tsoft.com]
    > The question is, how accurate is his worry that by "playing
    > along" with the system for two more years, he will compromise
    > his own resistance?

    Surely this is a judgment call based on the strength of conviction of
    the individual and just how large the gap is between his beliefs and
    the beliefs he would pretend at.

    I think a good place to search for past examples of this is in
    espionage. What little I know of the field leads me to believe that a
    great many spies have been in "deep cover" for years at a time without
    switching allegiances. Or at least, that's how it is in the spy
    movies and books. :)



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Jul 25 2003 - 00:56:04 MDT