Re: [Iraq] The real reason for the war

From: Dehede011@aol.com
Date: Sun Jun 08 2003 - 14:45:58 MDT

  • Next message: Mike Lorrey: "Re: Q: Simulation checking"

    In a message dated 6/8/2003 3:00:53 PM Central Standard Time,
    humania@t-online.de writes: For a new kind of transhumanism of social fairness where the poor
    and the losers get a fair chance.

    Right, now there is the perfect system of government -- one that is so
    vaguely defined that it means exactly what Humania decides after the fact it means.

           Lets face it Humania, no country has ever given the poor so good a
    chance as the US. That is why so many are trying to get in. As to the losers,
    Humania we have a good system of government and a good economic system of
    government going -- I don't know why we should switch and give you a chance. You
    imply you haven't done well under the existing system. Why should we be led by
    an self described loser? Did I misunderstand you?
           My problem with all the theorizing is this. I truly don't believe
    transhumanism stands much of a chance unless financed privately and even if it
    should come to pass under government auspices private individuals will get to
    enjoy it last.
    Ron h.



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Jun 08 2003 - 14:56:17 MDT