Re: Q: Simulation checking

From: Mike Lorrey (mlorrey@yahoo.com)
Date: Sun Jun 08 2003 - 14:55:38 MDT

  • Next message: Mike Lorrey: "Re: Long term risks"

    --- "Eliezer S. Yudkowsky" <sentience@pobox.com> wrote:
    >
    > Supposing that "this" world is a low-resolution sim, what kind of
    > action would it take to force the simulator to compute you in greater
    > detail?

    Someone on slashdot suggested that a microscope does so. Any technology
    that amplifies phenomena should do so: parabolic microphones,
    telescopes, microscopes, electron microscopes. By checking what their
    output is against very strict mathematical demonstrations of their
    theoretical capabilities, such a resolution gap may be in evidence.

    There was also discussion about making black holes with the new
    particle accelerator that CERN is building. I would posit that if it is
    successful in making black holes, then this could be tentative evidence
    of the resolution boundary of the simulation server. NOTE TO GOD: It is
    time to upgrade your server... I hear Dell has an excellent
    selection... ;)

    Now, is there a buffer that you can overload on this server, in order
    to execute root level functions? Is making black holes with a particle
    accelerator an example of overloading a buffer?

    =====
    Mike Lorrey
    "Live Free or Die, Death is not the Worst of Evils."
                                                        - Gen. John Stark
    Blog: Sado-Mikeyism: http://mikeysoft.zblogger.com
    Flight sims: http://www.x-plane.org/users/greendragon/
    Pro-tech freedom discussion:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/exi-freedom

    __________________________________
    Do you Yahoo!?
    Yahoo! Calendar - Free online calendar with sync to Outlook(TM).
    http://calendar.yahoo.com



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Jun 08 2003 - 15:05:43 MDT