RE: [Iraq] The real reason for the war

From: Hubert Mania (humania@t-online.de)
Date: Mon Jun 09 2003 - 09:42:03 MDT

  • Next message: Robert J. Bradbury: "PHYSICS: force fields"

    To M. Dickey, J. Clark and Ron h:

    I refuse talking or discussing with anyone of you any of your arguments,
    especially those of Michael Dickey, in detail. It would be a complete waste
    of time for both sides. Our views are not compatible. I only want to remind
    you from time to time that your violent world view still looks disgusting to
    a freelancing transhuman - but not necessarily *extropian* - guest here on
    this list who thinks the whole entropic side effect and expenditure of
    blowing away heat and sweat into the universe in the process of bringing up
    some non-violent arguments that the patriots here finally do not appreciate
    anyway, is in itself a pretty unextropian process of communication. We will
    never come together and I can easily live with this prospect :-)

    One word to Ron h: I don't feel being a loser at all. But confronted with
    the concentrated winner attitude here on the list, I feel sympathy for the
    losers and remember the artistic concept of "being allowed to fail" without
    being despised.

    Maybe I am not as brilliant as any one of you followers of violent fashion
    are. Maybe your exorbitantly gifted minds are already too close to mind
    blowing ideas all the time to understand my non-brilliant message. Anyway,
    what I was basically trying to communicate to you was this:

    If in June 2003 you are still on the same level as your fellow republican US
    politicians while dealing with ultra conservative monkey business like
    territorial pissings with funnily talking Arabs who stubbornly deny wearing
    blue jeans and display this strange effeminate outfit while unexpectedly
    rejecting the American way of life altogether, could it be that your
    Pentagon- and-White-House-dominated thinking in union with adrenalin-aided
    visualisations of smashing those Middle Eastern bastards which amplifies the
    already existing territorial bullshit in your brain and - in connection with
    an artificially produced feeling of helplessness and lack of security -
    evokes a cry for a Rumsfeldian solution and thus leads to an endlessly
    intensified vicious circle of astonishingly flexible ancient lizard brain
    circuits that spread the message towards the cortex to merely defend
    American borders between Kairo and Teheran and boosts
    testosterone-contaminated mammal behaviour which finally leads to a general
    regress of brain quality as well, are a bit too one-dimensional to be called
    transhuman - or extropian, if you like?

    Grammatical help: the nouns that "one-dimensional" refers to, are "thinking"
    and "visualisations". Sorry for my bad English. I wish I could write in
    German.

    Just an impression and not really a question from

    humania



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Jun 09 2003 - 09:56:06 MDT