From: Alex Ramonsky (alex@ramonsky.com)
Date: Tue Jun 17 2003 - 18:08:54 MDT
Impressive!
...Two threads which I have never read (and don't intend to) a single
post from, and suddenly I am appointed judge of some incident within
them, and also accredited with (apparently supernatural) powers of
awareness...
I'm _awfully_ flattered, but rather confused?
Alex Ramonsky
Lee Corbin wrote:
>Harvey writes
>
>
>
>>Ron wrote
>>
>>
>>
>>>In fact I will hazard a guess that he or she was
>>>involved in the debate called "cluster bombs"
>>>and changed the name while he was losing the debate called
>>>"cluster bombs."
>>>
>>>
>
>How do you know that this was the reason?
>
>
>
>>>I'll let you look it up and you can be
>>>the judge, Alex.
>>>
>>>
>>I don't understand why you would need to look this up, Ron.
>>The only person involved in both of those threads was you.
>>
>>
>
>For the record, there were only three posts in the "Cluster Bombs"
>thread, two by Amara and one by Ron.
>
>I think that Harvey then renamed the thread to "META: Dishonest
>debate (was "cluster bombs")". This began an lengthy discussion.
>
>
>
>>You argued with Amara in the "cluster bombs" thread and then
>>you argued with me in the "Dishonest debate (was cluster bombs)"
>>thread. You know who the "guy or gal" was in both of these threads.
>>
>>
>
>How do you know that he knew that?
>
>
>
>>You know it wasn't the same person trying to switch topics
>>as you "guessed."
>>
>>
>
>Sigh; you can't *know* such things?
>
>
>
>>The "cluster bombs" thread is at
>><http://forum.javien.com/conv.php?new=true&convdata=id::g4fuc8Q1-7@bB-0MBI-HKNB-OwUGmv5QGGDQ
>>The "Dishonest Debate (was cluster bombs)" thread is at
>><http://forum.javien.com/conv.php?new=true&convdata=id::opCaY@96-0764-OPBp-VWZl-Zi0Bwpetwi4P
>>Ron's above quote is at
>><http://forum.javien.com/XMLmessage.php?id=id::YzIzcTBK-KQIg-QUFF-BXgG-eQ9vJxNWAT9q>
>>
>>
>
>Darn! I just stumbled upon Hal's analysis at the time. It is at
>
>http://forum.javien.com/XMLmessage.php?id=id::cAM1LFJZ-DgYr-Sho@-YXIk-AV4yf05DaxhG
>
>wherein he criticizes both sides. All my work above for nothing <sigh>.
>
>Ron and Harvey: please listen to Hal. He's not on anyone's side
>(like I frequently am). And in all the years people have seen
>his posts, I don't think anyone could suggest any reason for him
>to fail to be impartial.
>
>Thanks,
>Lee
>
>
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Jun 17 2003 - 18:11:47 MDT