From: matus (matus@matus1976.com)
Date: Tue Jun 17 2003 - 03:16:41 MDT
Jeff barked:
> --- matus <matus@matus1976.com> wrote:
>
> > "...a list member and extropian, Jeff Davis,.."
>
> > "Perhaps Jeff would make the record official on that
> question?"
>
> For a response, allow me to turn the keyboard over to
> my expert on Vietnamese Restaurant atrocities:
>
> "Arff, arf aaarf. Arf arfaarf farf faaarf, arrrf, grr
> arrf aaaaarfff. Arff aarfff arf arf arrrf, grrr, woof
> woof arf. Grrgrrr arf arf aaaraf woof grr. Woof woof
> grrr aaaarf farf arfff, woof grrrrrr. Arf arfaarf
> farf, grrgrrr arf. Ruff ruff, grr arff grrr woof grr
> woof aaarfarf, grr arf. Aarf aaarf. Arf arfaarf farf
> faaarf, arrrf, grr arrf aaaaarfff. Arff aarfff aaaraf
> woof grr, ruff, grr arff, woof woof; arrf aaaaarfff.
Etc...
I certainly feel such a response was completely un-called for. I
clearly and sincerely asked a simple question. Does Jeff feel the North
Vietnamese Govt is legitimate. Jeff has alternately claimed that I
partake in Dishonest debate, that I violate the principles of good faith
discussion, that I am not qualified, refuse the discipline, effort,
responsibility, etc. etc. I also acknowledged that perhaps I was
incorrectly interpreting what Jeff was saying, and offered him the
chance to clear the air. Can my actions in my previous email be
reasonably considered dishonest, not in good faith, or irresponsible?
Yet I receive this as a response.
Jeff, at least please spare the list of such absurdity and send any
further barking to me offlist.
Michael Dickey
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Jun 17 2003 - 02:53:18 MDT