Re: Am I dishonest? (was RE: How best to spend US$200 billion?)

From: Dehede011@aol.com
Date: Sat Jun 14 2003 - 18:30:38 MDT

  • Next message: EvMick@aol.com: "Re: ENERGY: Singularity on hold?"

    In a message dated 6/14/2003 6:54:47 PM Central Standard Time,
    matus@matus1976.com writes:

    Question One: Does anyone else on the list feel that the current communist
    Vietnamese government is a legitimate one? Note I will not be attacking those
    who express this opinion, I am just curious how prevalent this opinion is on
    this list. Samantha, do YOU feel the current communist government of Vietnam is
    a legitimate one? Does anyone on this list (besides Jeff) feel as much?

    Answers with a question. Is anyone silly enough to think the government is
    anything less than a cash cow for the criminal syndicate that controls it.

    Question Two: Jeff makes various assertions about my debating abilities,
    including claiming that many of my 'facts' are inventions of my ideology, I am
    dishonest and insulting, incoherent, I am not qualified to discuss political
    topics, undisciplined, lack effort, responsibility, and skill. In addition, I
    have no capacity or inclination to distinguish fact from fantasy, and no logical
    coherence, and that Jeff will refrain from responding to me until I get better
    at 'thinking about such matters' With that I mind, I submit humbly to the
    list the question, do others feel this is an accurate description of my presence
    on the list.

    Answer, As to whether or not you occasionally fall from grace I can't say. I
    have never noticed you doing anything that was a major transgression from the
    rules of good sportsmanship. Most of your time is spent exposing Jeff's
    tactics. I say that with a certain admiration for Jeff's expertise at that game
    -- he and my ex mother in law could gain employment teaching the Marine Corps
    dirty fighting.
           The level of your debating skills would no doubt show an apparent (but
    not real) improvement in a debate between gentlemen.
    Ron h.



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Jun 14 2003 - 18:40:12 MDT