RE: The mistake of agriculture (was: evolution and diet)

From: gts (gts_2000@yahoo.com)
Date: Fri May 23 2003 - 09:14:40 MDT

  • Next message: Anders Sandberg: "Re: The mistake of agriculture (was: evolution and diet)"

    Anders Sandberg wrote:

    > HG tribes are
    > small and everybody is more or less in constant touch, so
    > there is no need for internal memos. The shaman might benefit
    > by noting down the sacred stories to give to his successor,
    > but is that benefit larger than the effort to prepare the
    > leaves and ink?

    You keep making good points about how competition between humans and between
    large groups of humans in the post-agricultural revolution world helped to
    fuel advancements like writing and math. I agree. The greater complexity of
    the new societies certainly must have accelerated our intellectual progress.

    However it is important to realize also that the most remarkable
    achievements of the human mind did not happen as a result agriculture or its
    ramifications. The "Great Leap Forward" for humanity is better dated circa
    40,000 BC. It was then that symbolism, art and other forms of communication
    became widespread.

    This is to say that we were already clearly on the path to the development
    of math and written language long before we started sowing seeds, stealing
    the milk of animals, and building businesses and cities. It would seem that
    large complex competitive societies were as much a result of our symbolic
    capacities as they were a cause of them.

    -gts



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri May 23 2003 - 09:24:39 MDT