RE: BIAS: CNN commits fraud, rewrites history, WAS: RE: "liberal media"

From: gts (gts_2000@yahoo.com)
Date: Mon May 19 2003 - 02:37:25 MDT

  • Next message: Samantha: "Re: "Hysteria, Thy Name is SARS""

    Mike Lorrey,

    [gts wrote:]
    >> The networks are perfectly free to decide which broadcast news
    >> segments will appear on their websites.
    >
    > Horse pucky. How many debates have we gotten into here where
    > one side or the other takes the opinion that if it isn't
    > documented online or other print form then it never happened
    > and/or the person claiming so is wrong/lying/bsing??? LOTS.

    If people here took that position then they were wrong. There is absolutely
    no reason any news network should be obligated to post every single
    televised word on its website.

    News networks did not even have websites until a few years ago. Are you
    suggesting that no argument about what transpired in the media could be
    resolved until the advent of the internet?

    I see from another message that you were able to find the transcript that
    you were looking for, so your accusation of "rewriting history" is not valid
    anyway.

    Probably the law requires that all television networks keep an unpublished
    archive of video tapes and/or transcripts of all broadcasts for X number of
    months, in case there should ever be any need for them in any legal
    investigation. That is all that should be required of them. Websites are
    separate publications.

    As for the charge of fraud, it looks like the CNN reporter was saying one
    thing about the physical effects of assault weapons while LaPierre of the
    NRA was saying another. Speaking as one who has never examined closely the
    effects of assault weapons on bullet-proof vests or other materials, I can't
    say who is right. I would not charge "fraud" without better evidence than
    the opinion of someone like LaPierre of the NRA who obviously has a
    political motive, nor would I dismiss the charge based only on the opinion
    of the CNN reporter who seems also to have had a political motive.

    In other words, while I don't doubt that CNN presented a biased view of
    assault weapons, I think your charges of "fraud" and "rewriting history" are
    both a bit over the top.

    -gts



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon May 19 2003 - 02:47:37 MDT