Re: [WAR]: not about WMD

From: Dehede011@aol.com
Date: Fri Apr 25 2003 - 16:11:46 MDT

  • Next message: gts: "RE: evolution and diet"

    In a message dated 4/25/2003 3:18:53 PM Central Standard Time,
    mwiik@messagenet.com writes: To build its case for war with Iraq, the Bush
    administration argued that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction,
    but some officials now privately acknowledge the White House had another
    reason for war — a global show of American power and democracy.

    Mike,
           It was entirely predictable that if we won in Iraq that the left wing
    would fall back regroup and go into its patented strategy perfected over the
    past 200 years. Rethink, rephrase &relabel, the shift from the concrete to
    the abstract. The opening salvo is to fire so many convoluted salvos that no
    one will ever be capable of answering them all.
           Just having General Gas Attack of Sadaam's Army threaten to gas us if
    we entered Iraqi territory was sufficient reason to believe Iraq had the WMDs
    to back up his threat. The fact that he had gone to great lengths to evade
    UN sanctions to have Scud missiles with an illegal range was enough to
    justify our thinking he didn't intend arming them with water balloons.
           I notice you quoted ABC news. Mike, I am truly ashamed of you. Any
    one of us that listened to ABC news during the war could have collected a
    pithier Anti-American statement from Peter Jennings than the one you used.
    For shame.
    Ron h



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Apr 25 2003 - 16:20:52 MDT