Re: WAR: Apparently the internet does NOT see censorship as damage and route

From: Dehede011@aol.com
Date: Wed Mar 26 2003 - 08:57:27 MST

Next message: John K Clark: "Re: Richard Dawkins in The Guardian (POLITICS)"

Previous message: hubert mania: "Re: WAR: Apparently the internet does NOT see censorship as damage and route"
Maybe in reply to: alexboko@umich.edu: "WAR: Apparently the internet does NOT see censorship as damage and route"
Next in thread: hubert mania: "Re: WAR: Apparently the internet does NOT see censorship as damage and route"
Reply: hubert mania: "Re: WAR: Apparently the internet does NOT see censorship as damage and route"
Reply: matus: "RE: WAR: Apparently the internet does NOT see censorship as damage and route"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

In a message dated 3/26/2003 9:53:34 AM Central Standard Time,
humania@t-online.de writes: And what is so wrong about it?

Humania,
You had a protest of perhaps a few dozen or a hundred teachers. You
proclaim it as a protest of thousands of students. That is what is wrong.
Ron h.

Next message: John K Clark: "Re: Richard Dawkins in The Guardian (POLITICS)"
Previous message: hubert mania: "Re: WAR: Apparently the internet does NOT see censorship as damage and route"
Maybe in reply to: alexboko@umich.edu: "WAR: Apparently the internet does NOT see censorship as damage and route"
Next in thread: hubert mania: "Re: WAR: Apparently the internet does NOT see censorship as damage and route"
Reply: hubert mania: "Re: WAR: Apparently the internet does NOT see censorship as damage and route"
Reply: matus: "RE: WAR: Apparently the internet does NOT see censorship as damage and route"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Mar 26 2003 - 09:04:44 MST