> It seems to me that in the long run 100% decentralization would
> result in the disintegration of the individual into freely roving
> subcognitive computational elements. Are you sure this is the kind
> of future you want to work for?
Hehe! Or indeed, into freely roving cells, or perhaps chromosomes,
or DNA molecules; or (shucks), give independence to quarks or strings!
Mind you, I don't think that this is what the original suggestion was
about. We're talking about decentralization within human social systems,
which reach 100% decentralization once the unit of granularity considered
is the human individual. That is indeed the kind of future I want to
work for.
Rich.
-- ########### Dr. Rich Artym ================ PGP public key available # galacta # Email : rich@galacta.demon.co.uk 158.152.156.137 # ->demon # Web : http://www.galacta.demon.co.uk 194.222.245.150 # ->ampr # AMPR : rich@g7exm[.uk].ampr.org 44.131.164.1 BBS:GB7MSW # ->NTS # Fun : Unix, X, TCP/IP, kernel, O-O, C++, SoftEng, Nano ########### More fun: Regional IP Coordinator Hertfordshire + N.London