>OK. I've had enough. To all members of this list:
>
>Is the endless ranting about TWA Flight 800 an appropriate topic
>for this list? I don't think so....
IAN: While I think there a deeper issues
here then TWA 800, such as logical analysis
and questioning of authoritian-truth decrees,
I agree that this is getting too much. I felt
the need to post some explanations for the
recent CNN flap, and I feel, swept up by
the "energy" of it I posted too much.
But I did not initiate debate on the topic.
I have made my case available at my webpage
I encourage people to read it there, not
compel me to make the case here by ad
hominem attacks on my person.
For those who want to challenge my claims,
study the case and publish a rebuttal in
an appropriate forum.
All I can say is if you base your opinion
on what you now hear in the news, your
selling yourself short. I believe it wise
to always second guess the authorities,
and speak out when their words don't
match the facts. That's what I've done.
Unfortunately, considering the extent
of attacks on me, I wish I had not.
It would be nice if people would examine
the facts, the message and not always
examine and attack the messenger, but
alas, that seems to be the rule.
****************************************************************
VISIT Ian Williams Goddard ----> http://www.erols.com/igoddard
________________________________________________________________