Re: Philosophy: It doesn't suck so bad we can't ignore it

From: Spudboy100@aol.com
Date: Sat Dec 23 2000 - 10:28:43 MST

Next message: Eliezer S. Yudkowsky: "Re: Fightin' words (was Re: MOVIE: "What Women Want")"
Previous message: Technotranscendence: "Re: Philosophy: It doesn't suck so bad we can't ignore it"
Maybe in reply to: J. R. Molloy: "Philosophy: It doesn't suck so bad we can't ignore it"
Next in thread: Technotranscendence: "Re: Philosophy: It doesn't suck so bad we can't ignore it"
Reply: Technotranscendence: "Re: Philosophy: It doesn't suck so bad we can't ignore it"
Reply: J. R. Molloy: "Re: Philosophy: It doesn't suck so bad we can't ignore it"
Reply: Gamma Pi: "Re: Philosophy: It doesn't suck so bad we can't ignore it"
Reply: Eliezer S. Yudkowsky: "Re: Philosophy: It doesn't suck so bad we can't ignore it"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

In a message dated 12/23/2000 12:11:58 PM Eastern Standard Time,
neptune@mars.superlink.net writes:

<< http://uweb.superlink.net/neptune/PCR.html >>
Does philosophy owe anything, as a discipline, to promote the greater good?
Is philosophy about also about problem solving?

Next message: Eliezer S. Yudkowsky: "Re: Fightin' words (was Re: MOVIE: "What Women Want")"
Previous message: Technotranscendence: "Re: Philosophy: It doesn't suck so bad we can't ignore it"
Maybe in reply to: J. R. Molloy: "Philosophy: It doesn't suck so bad we can't ignore it"
Next in thread: Technotranscendence: "Re: Philosophy: It doesn't suck so bad we can't ignore it"
Reply: Technotranscendence: "Re: Philosophy: It doesn't suck so bad we can't ignore it"
Reply: J. R. Molloy: "Re: Philosophy: It doesn't suck so bad we can't ignore it"
Reply: Gamma Pi: "Re: Philosophy: It doesn't suck so bad we can't ignore it"
Reply: Eliezer S. Yudkowsky: "Re: Philosophy: It doesn't suck so bad we can't ignore it"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon May 28 2001 - 09:50:39 MDT