Re: Philosophy: It doesn't suck so bad we can't ignore it

From: Eliezer S. Yudkowsky (sentience@pobox.com)
Date: Tue Dec 26 2000 - 21:44:47 MST

Next message: Samantha Atkins: "Re: High Technology of the Future"
Previous message: Harvey Newstrom: "Re: High Technology of the Future"
In reply to: Spudboy100@aol.com: "Re: Philosophy: It doesn't suck so bad we can't ignore it"
Next in thread: Andy Toth: "Re: Philosophy: It doesn't suck so bad we can't ignore it"
Reply: Andy Toth: "Re: Philosophy: It doesn't suck so bad we can't ignore it"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

"Philosophy is calling a stinkweed a rose in hopes of improving its
aroma."
-- dtgosnell

-- -- -- -- --
Eliezer S. Yudkowsky http://singinst.org/
Research Fellow, Singularity Institute for Artificial Intelligence

Next message: Samantha Atkins: "Re: High Technology of the Future"
Previous message: Harvey Newstrom: "Re: High Technology of the Future"
In reply to: Spudboy100@aol.com: "Re: Philosophy: It doesn't suck so bad we can't ignore it"
Next in thread: Andy Toth: "Re: Philosophy: It doesn't suck so bad we can't ignore it"
Reply: Andy Toth: "Re: Philosophy: It doesn't suck so bad we can't ignore it"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon May 28 2001 - 09:50:40 MDT