Wafer-thin mints, one assumes. There ought to be a standard shorthand
way of indicating the delay-'til-better-tech-comes-along gambit. Any
tidy coinings to offer?
Damien Broderick wrote:
> Assuming it's not more cost-effective to work as hard as possible on nano
> for a decade or so and then do it using NM mints blasted at Mars with a
> railgun.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon May 28 2001 - 09:50:17 MDT