Re: Dissuasion vs. Persuasion, was Re: [Iraq] The real reason for the war

From: Spudboy100@aol.com
Date: Sat Jun 07 2003 - 22:42:18 MDT

Next message: Damien Broderick: "Re: [Para-Discuss] faster than light?"

Previous message: Spudboy100@aol.com: "Re: Dissuasion vs. Persuasion, was Re: [Iraq] The real reason for the war"
Maybe in reply to: Michael M. Butler: "Dissuasion vs. Persuasion, was Re: [Iraq] The real reason for the war"
Next in thread: Dehede011@aol.com: "Re: [Iraq] The real reason for the war"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Apologies for the double Bounce of my previous post. Our wunnderful friends
at AOL seem to have their mail service under attack by alien powers. Perhaps
those devilish Kentuckians. Watch the skies!

Next message: Damien Broderick: "Re: [Para-Discuss] faster than light?"
Previous message: Spudboy100@aol.com: "Re: Dissuasion vs. Persuasion, was Re: [Iraq] The real reason for the war"
Maybe in reply to: Michael M. Butler: "Dissuasion vs. Persuasion, was Re: [Iraq] The real reason for the war"
Next in thread: Dehede011@aol.com: "Re: [Iraq] The real reason for the war"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Jun 07 2003 - 22:52:25 MDT