>>
None other than the common sense fact that this statistic was only cited as
a 'might be the case', a 'for instance' to support the company's prospectus
of this thread's original 'brainwashing', 'propaganda' proposition; - a
point of view for which I'm sure there are many other examples that one
could throw into the pot of probabilities. Aside from the 1/3 probability
that a drug research $100m startup would write the scam into their
prospectus that Amsterdam's elephant's graveyard actually requested the drug
trial on humanitarian grounds then I have no reason to doubt what I read.
Actual hard copy of the prospectus would have to be dug up by a local in
>>Considering that transients might end up dying of throat cancer in
>>Amsterdam then the fact that they bring their ailments with them creates
>>a very strong statistic.
>
>
> IAN: Do you have any evidence to support this "very
> strong statistic" that would show that the purported
> highest-rate of throat cancer is linked to vagabonds?
>