> In reality, and once this sort of thing becomes common(ish), I suppose
> there *will* be a few kids who get conceived and born for purely
> instrumental motives, and who have a terrible time as a result.
There's no ethical or practical reason that parents should not be allowed
to conceive a child and make the decision not to grow the new embryo beyond
the stage required to save their already-born ill child. This would solve
the problem of bringing unwanted children into the world. But I agree with
Damien that in most cases the life-saving child would be grown to term,
welcomed into the world, and greatly loved and appreciated by the parents
and the rescued sibling.
PanTerra Small Business Strategies
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat May 11 2002 - 17:44:30 MDT