Mike Lorrey <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> Considering that Chomsky is one of those types who continues to make
> excuses for the Khmer Rouge's killing fields (one of Chomsky's cause
> celebre), he is indeed as John describes.
I've heard that, but never actually read it myself. Which is good, since
I think I got some useful stuff out of some writings of his about the
differences in american press coverage when reporting on el salvador vs.
nicaragua. If I had first encountered Chomsky via his defense of the
Khmer Rouge I doubt I would have read further.
What think you, extropians? Would you rather be judged by the best thing
you wrote, or the worst?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat May 11 2002 - 17:44:12 MDT