>From: James Rogers <firstname.lastname@example.org>
>Huh? In our system of law, the sins of the father are not visited upon the
>son. If my great-grandfather killed someone and profited by it, you can't
>come after me for the murder.
What does not apply to individuals may in fact apply to corporations and
governments. If Datsun sells a car that is inherently dangerous and then is
acquired by Nissan, there is a very good chance that when my Datsun blows up
and kills my family Nissan will have to pay.
>And if you apply an "ill-gotten gains"
>argument, you will have to quantify precisely how money I earned at my job
>can be directly traced to an ill-gotten gain, since I never inherited
>anything from my great-grandfather other than his name.
>It is as simple as that. If you can directly trace any asset I own as an
>ill-gotten gain from slavery, I suppose I could give it up to the rightful
>owners without a problem. But since I grew up and lived most of my life
>destitute, with everything I own being the result of years of easily
>documented sacrifice and hard work, I think you'll have hard time.
The current national reparations "debate" has not in the slightest focused
on suing *individuals*, regardless of their race or the "sins" of their
particular ancestors. Your argument does not fit the issue under
Life is good. Refuse to die.
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Oct 12 2001 - 14:40:00 MDT