Re: Turtles, turtles, turtles... (was Re: Creationists)
James (james@lloyd-hughes.clara.net)
Tue, 23 Jun 1998 21:15:33 +0100
- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: J. R. Molloy: "Re: Turtles, turtles, turtles... (was Re: Creationists)"
- Previous message: James: "Re: Information"
- Maybe in reply to: Gerhard Kessell-Haak: "Turtles, turtles, turtles... (was Re: Creationists)"
- Next in thread: Anders Sandberg: "Re: Turtles, turtles, turtles... (was Re: Creationists)"
- Reply: Anders Sandberg: "Re: Turtles, turtles, turtles... (was Re: Creationists)"
- Reply: Anders Sandberg: "Re: Turtles, turtles, turtles... (was Re: Creationists)"
Hara Ra <harara@shamanics.com> said on
Tue, 23 Jun 1998 00:44:44 -0700:
>... and little fleas have even smaller fleas,
> and so on ad infinitum...
>
>So, sub quarks will be smaller, and more massive.
>and sub sub quarks heavier still, till
>the FINAL PARTICLE
>
>has the mass of the entire universe....
Sorry if I'm wrong, but how can something smaller
than what it makes up be more massive than it?
James
james@lloyd-hughes.clara.net
- Next message: J. R. Molloy: "Re: Turtles, turtles, turtles... (was Re: Creationists)"
- Previous message: James: "Re: Information"
- Maybe in reply to: Gerhard Kessell-Haak: "Turtles, turtles, turtles... (was Re: Creationists)"
- Next in thread: Anders Sandberg: "Re: Turtles, turtles, turtles... (was Re: Creationists)"
- Reply: Anders Sandberg: "Re: Turtles, turtles, turtles... (was Re: Creationists)"
- Reply: Anders Sandberg: "Re: Turtles, turtles, turtles... (was Re: Creationists)"