Re: Fuzzy Logic (Was Tarsky)

Daniel Fabulich (daniel.fabulich@yale.edu)
Wed, 27 May 1998 04:30:29 -0400 (EDT)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Technotranscendence: "more info on "Think Twice" in NYC"
Previous message: Hara Ra: "Re: TWA Flight 800, reflections on"
In reply to: EvMick: "Re: Bogus Barney"
Next in thread: Ian Goddard: "Re: TWA Flight 800, reflections on"
Reply: Ian Goddard: "Re: TWA Flight 800, reflections on"

On Tue, 26 May 1998, Warrl kyree Tale'sedrin wrote:

> According to the best current theories, there are indeed times -- at the
> subnuclear level at least -- when the truth itself is fuzzy.

Yes, but this is different in that the truth is "fuzzy" in a very specific
way; even the truly random is just that: TRULY random.

Next message: Technotranscendence: "more info on "Think Twice" in NYC"
Previous message: Hara Ra: "Re: TWA Flight 800, reflections on"
In reply to: EvMick: "Re: Bogus Barney"
Next in thread: Ian Goddard: "Re: TWA Flight 800, reflections on"
Reply: Ian Goddard: "Re: TWA Flight 800, reflections on"