> Thanks for the nod, Dan. But I'm a bit worried about the way you've
> adapted my term `spike'.
Hmm, it seems to work rather good within the context of this
discussion, and didn't the original thread predate your book? But it
is probably a good idea to remain aware of the difference between the
concepts. In this discussion prediction horizons are (so far)
irrelevant, only speed and bootstrapping is.
-- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Anders Sandberg Towards Ascension! asa@nada.kth.se http://www.nada.kth.se/~asa/ GCS/M/S/O d++ -p+ c++++ !l u+ e++ m++ s+/+ n--- h+/* f+ g+ w++ t+ r+ !y