> I did not react to that word, but to the QUEER bashing.
Was that really what the reaction was about? I honestly don't
see any queer-bashing at all in my comment. The word "tree-hugger"
is a bit derogatory, but "lesbian" is plain English, and I did
not imply that the set of adjectives I used go together as a
generalization or anything, they just happened to be the opposites
of the ones Mike used ("hot intelligent hetero GOPers").
Yes, it would have been out of line if I had implied that lesbians
were ugly and dumb or something (but I know better--I've had two
wonderfully bright and beautiful bi girlfriends, and I haven't
been 100% straight all my life either).
-- Lee Daniel Crocker <firstname.lastname@example.org> <http://www.piclab.com/lee/> "All inventions or works of authorship original to me, herein and past, are placed irrevocably in the public domain, and may be used or modified for any purpose, without permission, attribution, or notification."--LDC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jul 27 2000 - 14:13:14 MDT