> So far Au is still gold standard in dental materials. Maybe
> aesthetically less than perfect, but toxicologically uncontroversial
> and damn durable. >>
> ... Au is NOT the
> standard in dental materials. It was... 50 years ago, but believe it or not,
> dental technology has actually significantly advanced since 1950! And your
> quote, 'the polymer doesn't age well'. I, like most dentists, have been
> using polymers for years and years, and I would choose a polymer restorative
> way over dental gold, or amalgams anytime.
> Ed Reifman, MS, DDS
Hmm. My own experience (from the other side of the chair) supports gold.
I have polymer fillings on visible surfaces, but when I had to get a crown
on one a bit further back my dentist recommended gold as more reliable.
I have since had to replace at least one polymer crown, but the gold one
never gives me any trouble. This was not very long ago: perhaps 5 years.
Is my dentist just using the wrong polymers, or are you perhaps putting
too much faith in them?
-- Lee Daniel Crocker <email@example.com> <http://www.piclab.com/lcrocker.html> "All inventions or works of authorship original to me, herein and past, are placed irrevocably in the public domain, and may be used or modified for any purpose, without permission, attribution, or notification."--LDC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jul 27 2000 - 14:04:21 MDT