Eugene Leitl wrote:
> I don't have much time for this, so I have to be selective/brief. Also
> this is starting to get past the point of diminishing returns.
> Once again, in the topsy-turvy world of cryonics the bringer of bad
> news bears the burden of proof. Don't expect me to waste a lot of my
> time on it.
> Nothing indeed. It's all just a PRNG, deep down below. Once you know
> the algorithm, you can reverse it. In a vision, St. Margolus told me
> that, while cherubs Fredkin and Toffioli sang a sweet duet above.
> You'll have your evidence, hopefully in form of a few
> publications. Once again, don't expect me to waste significant amounts
> of my time pounding the message home. I do not care enough to try to
> change your mind.
Hmm. It would appear that this thread has exceeded its useful lifespan. I
don't think there is any point in trading this kind of remark back and forth
for the next week, so I'll just stop here.
However, I am curious as to whether the list is interested in seeing a full
explanation of my camp's position. I think I could do a decent summary in a
few pages, and it might make a good reference point for further discussion.
However, there wouldn't be any point if Eugene and I are the only ones who
read it - it is pretty obvious we aren't going to change each other's minds
So, is there anyone who would be interested?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jul 27 2000 - 14:04:21 MDT