Re: barbie promoted to threat

From: Adrian Tymes (wingcat@pacbell.net)
Date: Fri Sep 12 2003 - 22:13:50 MDT

  • Next message: Adrian Tymes: "Re: barbie promoted to threat"

    --- Kevin Freels <megaquark@hotmail.com> wrote:
    > Did I miss something? I wasn't aware of any tankers
    > of free oil going into
    > the hands of our government recently.

    The typical justification for these charges runs lumps
    big corporations in with (usually US) government. In
    this case, lots more oil at reduced prices is flowing
    into certain oil companies than would have without US
    action; said companies have indirect financial links
    to many in the administration, who personally profit.
    There is enough indirection in the system to avoid
    trivial proof, and a more in-depth proof - assuming
    the justification is correct - would require the type
    of lawsuit that typically gets thrown out of court
    quickly (before discovery can happen) for want of
    specific charges and pre-discovery evidence.



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Sep 12 2003 - 22:25:23 MDT