From: Adrian Tymes (wingcat@pacbell.net)
Date: Thu Sep 04 2003 - 12:54:10 MDT
--- BillK <bill@wkidston.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
> From US Department of Justice:
> http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/cvict_c.htm#property
> "Property crime makes up about three-quarters of all
> crime in the United
> States."
>
> So tagging everything would stop three-quarters of
> all crime!!!
> Can this be possible?!
Interesting choice of words. "Tagging" also refers to
grafitti which, when sprayed on non-public surfaces
one does not own or otherwise have permission to
deface, is vandalism, and therefore a property crime.
"Yes, I can prove absolutely beyond any shadow of a
doubt that it was my car's windows that were broken.
But who broke 'em?"
There's also the little fact that possession is not
itself stopped by adding RFIDs and the like -
deterred, possibly, if the item will be held long
enough that scanners are likely to come looking
anywhere near the suspect. But consumable goods can
be consumed ("You're saying that was your gasoline?
Good luck proving it: it's fumes now."), small items
can have their IDs removed or disabled (though
anything $10K and up - like a car - and easily stolen
is often worthy enough of protection that it is
already "tagged", or otherwise protected), and most
anything can be moved through the black market before
scanners come looking.
Also, consider that most criminals give no thought to
what happens if they're caught. In the same defiance
of rational thought that leads them to believe crime
pays in the long run, they usually simply believe they
won't be caught. (There are exceptions, of course,
and for some criminals - usually the ones who think
clearly enough about this that they do not, in fact,
get caught - crime does pay. But that's a small
fraction of the cases, since most people who think
that clearly tend to find far more profitable uses for
their time.)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Sep 04 2003 - 13:03:40 MDT