From: Adrian Tymes (wingcat@pacbell.net)
Date: Tue Sep 02 2003 - 16:39:45 MDT
--- "Robert J. Bradbury" <bradbury@aeiveos.com> wrote:
> Ok, here is an idea for you, based on:
>
>
http://www.nytimes.com/2003/09/02/business/02CHIN.html?hp=&pagewanted=printrX
>
> (which you have to get in the next few days for
> "free")
>
> China is on track to purchase ~$80 billion of U.S.
> government securities
> this year. That is about 20% of the current budget
> deficit.
>
> Bottom line (perhaps) -- we can't touch them and
> they can't touch us
> (or all hell breaks loose). Interesting -- it would
> seem that the
> Russians are side-lined from 'balance of power'
> debates -- at least
> from an economic perspective.
Cute. Instead of nuclear Mutually Assured
Destruction, we're playing with financial Mutually
Assured Destruction. One wonders if this is perhaps
more dangerous, because a short-sighted leader on
either side could see that immediate war would not
have consequences until at least the next budgetary
cycle, which could be beyond the present leader's term
in office - especially on the US's side. (See the
present administration's troubles in that regard.)
But, that aside, it is far safer for those not in
power.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Sep 02 2003 - 16:53:11 MDT