consilience

From: Damien Broderick (damienb@unimelb.edu.au)
Date: Sun Aug 31 2003 - 21:36:40 MDT

  • Next message: Emlyn O'regan: "re: AI or PR Guff?"

    I don't suppose anyone here has yet read Stephen Jay Gould's final
    postmortem book THE HEDGEHOG, THE FOX, AND THE MAGISTER'S POX? The long
    closing chapter is an attempted assault on Ed Wilson's allegedly
    reductionist account of consilience--the goal of unity between all
    disciplines--in familiar Gouldian skeptical terms that invoke the veiling
    force of emergence and contingency, in the overarching context of his
    suggested principle of NOMA (Non-Overlapping Magisteria, or teaching
    authorities, that include the sciences, the humanities, religion/ethics,
    aesthetics, and perhaps others unspecified, possibly including baseball.
    That last was a joke. I think). I strongly suspect NOMA is a cop-out. (And
    I can't even work out why it isn't NOM, unless his original formulation was
    Non-Overlapping Magisterial Authorities.) I'd be interesting in hearing
    opinions on the book.

    Damien Broderick



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Aug 31 2003 - 21:47:37 MDT