From: Barbara Lamar (barbaralamar@sanmarcos.net)
Date: Sun Aug 31 2003 - 14:25:02 MDT
Correction --
I wrote:
> This is one reason I find the PA so troubling: see, it wasn't the CPA's
> problem, beyond the need to cover his ass if the client later complained.
> And the client was not given the opportunity to challenge the
> investigation,
> because the CPA was not allowed to inform him (prohibition of
> communication
> from CPA to client is authorized by Section 213 of the PA).
I meant to write Section 215, not 213.
Barbara
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Aug 31 2003 - 14:36:34 MDT