From: Samantha Atkins (samantha@objectent.com)
Date: Wed Aug 20 2003 - 03:18:52 MDT
On Tuesday 19 August 2003 07:48, John K Clark wrote:
> "Samantha Atkins" <samantha@objectent.com>
>
> > As you were the one that made a baseless insinuation out of my remark
>
> about
>
> > your denial (that river in egypt), there is nothing further I need say.
>
> Baseless? Do you really want me to quote back your post where you invite me
> to swim with the crocodiles? Or would you prefer the one you sent a few
> hours later where immediately after explaining that personal insults are
> the worse thing that could possibly happen to this list you say I am
> tremendously uncaring, unobservant, dishonest and like to stick my head in
> the sand?
I said that I find your denial of Mike being any problem at all on this list
to be some variety of unobersant, willing refusing to see or being in denial.
That is a perfectly reasonable remark that is not in the least an ad hominem.
I am frankly utterly perplexed how you can hold the position you apparently
do on this matter. I don't see how it can be held honestly by someone of
your intelligence. I have experienced you in the past when people got hurt
on this list copping the same attitude. It is a pattern of yours. I find it
objectionable.
Now that I have spoon fed something so simple to you can we get on with what
we are supposedly here for? Or do you wish to waste more time?
>
> >I say that temporarily suspending Mike makes sense.
>
> If so then please explain why temporarily suspending you wouldn't make
> sense too. Please note I'm not pushing to expel anyone, I don't mind a few
> insults, but you must see the inconsistency.
>
Because I have done nothing to deserve it. Mike has. There is no
inconsistency.
- samantha
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Aug 20 2003 - 03:26:10 MDT