Re: `extropianism'? (was: Re: Are Extropians promoters of an ascetic ideal and alienation?)

From: Natasha Vita-More (natasha@natasha.cc)
Date: Mon Aug 04 2003 - 09:02:21 MDT

  • Next message: David A. Kekich: "RE: Physical Immortality magazine debut"

    At 03:46 PM 8/4/03 +1000, Brett wrote:

    >There is also a reason for branding and I am not speaking
    >on behalf of ExI now just stating my own opinion. Brands,
    >like flags, serve as rallying points around which likeminded
    >individuals may gather. When likeminded individuals wish
    >to influence policy and the lawmaking process that will
    >crystalise particular futures from a range of possible ones
    >it helps to have some set of principles around which to
    >gather. Branding is therefore not merely about novelty for
    >novelty sake it is about utility. Personally I would rather
    >explain the simple principle of extropy as opposed to that
    >of entropy (which is pretty widely understood) and point
    >that someone in the direction of this mailing list and the ExI
    >principles then to have to wrestle with that someones
    >perception and possible misunderstanding

    Well said Brett. In the business world, branding is so understood that it
    seems philistine to question the reasons for branding. The fact that
    extropy is the opposite of entropy is the key to ExI.

    Natasha

    Natasha Vita-More
    http://www.natasha.cc
    ----------
    President, Extropy Institute
    http://www.extropy.org
    Founder, Transhumanist Arts & Culture
    http://www.transhuman.org
    http://www.extropic-art.com
    http://www.transhumanist.biz



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Aug 04 2003 - 07:11:03 MDT