Why I think extropianism is hardly a new philosophy

From: p_chikara@hotmail.com
Date: Sun Aug 03 2003 - 14:53:19 MDT

  • Next message: Natasha Vita-More: "BBC Radio Discusses Transhumanity and "Primo""

    This post will sound harsh but fair; I think it's the best way to show you
    all my appreciation.

    I think this community can be percieved negatively because of that "having
    visions that are shocking to the social consensus" thing; these visions
    being at the fringe of conjectures and actual trends, it can be frustrating
    for people who don't want to miss on the evolutionary advantages this tribe
    might have yet don't want to bet on duds.
    This situation saddens me because I find myself "shot by both sides" :
    extropianism and the majority of people are either at best lacking the
    historical culture to know these ideas are old hat or at worst voluntarly
    omitting this knowledge by sheer vanity.

    The visions and methodology of Extropianism hardly makes it a new
    philosophy.

    Charles Fourier, great historian of the future, philosopher of glorious
    musical tomorrows of harmonious bodies, way after civilizations, when the
    flesh will be invested of ideal qualities , who was appreciated by Marx and
    Engels, was proposing an harmonian revolution.
    Here's some traduction of passages from Oeuvre complètes tome VIII and
    Bulletin de Lyon, 1804:
    "humanity will wake itself to the materialist ameliorations it's body is
    suceptible to."
    He was forecasting living on other planets since at this point the earth
    would be too small.
    "New and useful properties gained by earthlings living in these new celestal
    countries: amphiby, night vision, perpetual growth of hairs and teeths,
    indolorism , whitening to the sun etc"
    Forecasting genetic manipulations:
    "from their torso a new appendice would grow: used either as a powerful
    weapon, to prevent falls, a superb ornament with infinite force and
    dexterity. Habitants of suns, lactées and ringed planets like saturn are
    amphibious, by the effect of an ouverture in the casing of their heart, and
    have a fifth member common to both sex: the archiarm who can kill an animal
    in one shot, be used as a whirling parachute, a motor for fake wings, a rope
    ladder, a swim-aid that gives man the velocity of a fish and thousand ohter
    possibilities either on earth or in the seas. The archiarm triples
    productivity of the industry and bring the body at it's ultimate degree of
    biological perfection."

    (He too, as I said in another post, could be a promoter of impossible
    bodies, but that's another story...)

    That ought to be enough for the vision part. A bit frivolous and funny but
    not much more than saying that in the future our children will be few and
    immensely valued, huanity will have to deal with hypermaturity etc.

    On the methodological front, I present you Condorcet who concludes his
    _Esquisse d'un tableau historique des progrès de l'esprit humain_ by
    predicting the end of stupidity, hypocrisy and the emergence of a new body
    made possible by technological, scientific and medical progress.
    Sounds cutting edge? It was written in 1795.
     Death is percieved as a hypothesis to be reserved to exceptional cases like
    accidents or rare probabilities. The lenght of life, considerably augmented
    "get close to for ever (...) an unlimited lenght".
    So it is : a body who escaped the laws of nature and entropy ...

    Genuine ignorance or vanity, it doesn't matter to me: as a group,
    extropians/transhumanists are a bit too eager to misread their predecesor in
    order to make room for themselves...
    Also, using the structure of an "institute" / "school of philosophy" is a
    massive philosophical regression, sad, a system of terror, with the
    pretention of making something new but is a king-sized povrety.
     I think we have great dreams but extropians don't go at it the right way.
    Don't even think of calling Fourier and Condorcet proto extropians, please,
    that would be disingenious for the other way around woud be more logical
    since they are already accepted in the academic network, humanity's common
    cultural heritage and they had more historical influence than their current
    poor unsuccessful incarnation: extropianism is just a materialism and
    realizing it by droping the usless brand name would be the mature thing to
    do for it would help in getting credibility and real life traction to our
    common dreams.
    Rejoice! You are not an extropian, you are a materialist ! :-)
    You are part of a tradition and your ideas are accepted more easily.
    Do I think this post will change anything to the established order? I know
    people who are branded extropians or transhumanists won't budge, I wrote
    this for people who will get interested in these problems of our time, so
    they won't needlessly cripple their game.
    May our dreams be reality!

    Sébastien Chikara



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Aug 03 2003 - 15:02:25 MDT