RE: NEWS:Why 'Terrordaq' will come - if the Pentagon likes it or not

From: Rafal Smigrodzki (rafal@smigrodzki.org)
Date: Fri Aug 01 2003 - 11:29:01 MDT

  • Next message: Anders Sandberg: "Re: Fermi "Paradox""

    Giulio wrote:

    Assuming that the system would work, we have here an idea
    > that someone at DARPA has considered worth spending millions on, on
    > the basis of operational considerations, then has been dropped on the
    > basis of ethical and PC considerations. So this looks like a terrific
    > business opportunity for the private sector, as the BBC author says.
    > It would be interesting taking a look at the DARPA project
    > documentation, that has disappeared from the DARPA website, does
    > anyone have copies? How could such a business be developed?

    ### I wouldn't be surprised if the Pentagon went ahead with a covert futures
    market, open to FBI/Homeland Security?CIA/NSA/OtherUnheardOfSpyAgency
    employees, so as to allow aggregation of data among persons most likely to
    have data in the first place, with a big "Top Secret" stamp on it and some
    deniability (perhaps as in a tolerated semi-informal betting market to be
    ditched if the sanctimonious crowd gets wind of it). Almost all the benefits
    of PAM, none of the exposure to idiots.

    Rafal



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Aug 01 2003 - 08:35:49 MDT