RE: Being Extropic

From: Natasha Vita-More (natasha@natasha.cc)
Date: Thu Jul 31 2003 - 22:45:37 MDT

  • Next message: Damien Broderick: "RE: Being Extropic"

    At 09:32 AM 8/1/03 +0930, Emlyn wrote:
    >Of course not; we never have been. Total safety is illusory.
    >
    >So the question is "how safe are we"?
    >
    >How about a poll...
    >
    >Who on the list personally knows someone affected by terrorism. Personal
    >acquaintances as maximum distance, no friends of friends please.
    >
    >More subjective: would you rate yourself now (hopefully based on some kind
    >of quasi-empirical guestimate, at least) as more or less safe than you were
    >10 years ago? 20 years ago? What are the major threats to your continued
    >existence/lifestyle? How about 10 years into the future?

    More safe than 10 and 20 years ago based on becoming increasingly cautious
    and aware that even though terrorism has become limpid or transparent,
    there are more terrorists and it seems to be in season.

    Less safe than 10 years in the future. Ten years from now, there will be
    better self-monitoring devices and the business of designing
    hardware/software/fashionware for protection will be more sophisticated,
    lower priced, and available.

    Natasha

    Natasha Vita-More
    http://www.natasha.cc
    ----------
    President, Extropy Institute
    http://www.extropy.org
    Founder, Transhumanist Arts & Culture
    http://www.transhuman.org
    http://www.extropic-art.com
    http://www.transhumanist.biz



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Jul 31 2003 - 20:52:32 MDT