From: Giu1i0 Pri5c0 (gpmap@runbox.com)
Date: Thu Jul 10 2003 - 23:24:57 MDT
Nice paper Gina. McKibben makes as much sense as those who, realizing that
they will never be rich, say that being poor is better than being rich.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Gina Miller" <nanogirl@halcyon.com>
To: <extropians@extropy.org>
Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 6:34 AM
Subject: New Cryonic Suspension Paper
> Read a new paper The Bioethical Implications, Dilemmas And Questions
> Involved With Cryonic Suspension written May 31, 2003 by Gina Miller. This
> paper documents the cryonic movement's history, man's various strategies
to
> satisfy the quest for immortality (the conditioning to accept death), why
> cryonics is not wrong (the controversy), nanotechnology as revival, legal
> issues (Dora Kent, Thomas Donaldson and Ted Williams), and the vision.
> http://www.nanoindustries.com/feature/cryoethics.html
> Also, read this supplement to the above paper, an imaginary conversation
> about cryonic suspension. There are two characters, Nikolai a man who
> recently signed up for cryonic suspension and Bertrand a man who believes
> that death is inevitable. By Gina Miller, May 31, 2003.
> http://www.nanoindustries.com/feature/cryoconversation.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Jul 10 2003 - 23:35:22 MDT