From: ABlainey@aol.com
Date: Thu Jul 10 2003 - 17:29:36 MDT
In a message dated 10/07/2003 05:01:45 GMT Daylight Time,
shade999@optonline.net writes:
> On a side note, I died laughing when someone pointed out that any
> advanced civilization would be
> using some other carrier wave other than radio-waves (light, gravity
> etc) and thus SETI (in its current incarnation)
> might be a waste of time... Personally my bet is on gravity pulses..
> Even better than light because (even though
> it might be imperceptible), it affects everything simoultaneously...
> Somebody recently asked a really intriguing
> question, whats the speed of propogation for gravity :) Unfortunately
> they're still constructing an experiment
> thats sensitive to detect it :) I'm particularly interested in
> gravity....
>
> omard-out
>
>
This is also my view , that gravity being instantanious gives an unbeatable
method of information transfer. That is of course depending on the propgation
speed. Everything I have read thus far states that the propogation is
istantanious. I do have some serious worries about this and will closely watch the
results of any experiments that are performed.
The only way I can easily except that the propogation is instananious, is
that every particle in the universe that exerts gravity. Is entagled with every
other particle. I can 'kind of' except this, baring in mind that all the
particles came from the sub-atomic soup that existed pre big bang.
I did spend a few brain cycles on a possible experiment utilising the
apparent ability of cryogenic superconducters to reduce gravity. I didnt get very far
due to the math and the constant nagging in the back of my mind that if we
mess around with gravity, we also mess with time and have to somehow factor this
into the eqautions.
Alex
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Jul 10 2003 - 17:40:11 MDT